Cases 41 - 50 of 162
Perry v. Erdos et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
Warden Ron Erdos, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Unit Manager Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Marquez B. Perry
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Warden Ronald Erdos, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis
Plaintiff:
Jermeal White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Little et al
as 1:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Cythia Davis, Case Manager Michael Rush, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendrick v. Erdos et al
as 2:2021cv00983
Defendant:
Institutional Insp Linnea Mahlman, Health Care Admin Goodwin, Aramark Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermeal White v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 21-3218
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSISTANT WARDEN LARRY GREEN, RONALD ERDOS, Warden and SERGEANT B. BARNEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMEAL WHITE
Jermeal White v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 21-3204
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICERS JOHN DOES, 1-2, UNIT MANAGER CHIEF CYNTHIA DAVIS, RONALD ERDOS, Warden, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMEAL WHITE
Jermeal White v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 21-3169
Defendant / Appellee:
D. STRINGER, Correction Officer, RONALD ERDOS, Warden and CYNTHIA DAVIS, Unit Manager Chief
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMEAL WHITE
Jermeal White v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 21-3154
Defendant:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMEAL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DUNLAP
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Major Galloway, Joshua Gullett, Linnea Mahlman and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Warden Ronald Erdos
as 2:2021cv00137
Petitioner:
Justin R Blevins
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
