Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Stanifer v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
Crystal Michelle Stanifer
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sellers v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
Penny Gladys Sellers
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00228
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
Tammy Irene Phillips
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowe v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Mary Madeline Lowe
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLeod v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00227
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, American Medical Systems, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Linda F McLeod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Casteel v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Laura F Casteel
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Morgan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorpe v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Tina Darlene Thorpe
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendelman v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Stephanie K. Hendelman
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
