Cases 1 - 10 of 3,833
Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc. v. Tehum Care Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00018
Defendant:
Tehum Care Services, Inc., Corizon Health, Inc., CHS TX, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Loyde v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00710
Defendant:
Molly O'Toole, Elliot Garrett, Christopher Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Mack Mandrell Loyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corizon Health, Inc. v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00463
Plaintiff:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bass v. Taylor et al
as 1:2018cv01237
Defendant:
County Mayor Jimmy Sain, Dr. Larry Bloomingburg, Nicole Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Perez D. Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2018cv02732
Defendant:
Donna Chisholm and Corizon Health Inc.
Plaintiff:
Casey Lee Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Baskas et al
as 3:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Elena Baskas, Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Baskas et al
as 3:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Elena Baskas, Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Baskas et al
as 3:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Elena Baskas, Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Baskas et al
as 3:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Elena Baskas, Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Baskas et al
as 3:2018cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Elena Baskas, K. Barcklay-Dodson, (f/n/u) Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
