Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jeremy Gallant v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 21-4134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY P. GALLANT
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM COOL, CAPTAIN COLE DISTEL and others
Franklin v. Mohr et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Distel, John Doe, Correctional Officer Kyle and others
Plaintiff:
Algernon Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mahlman et al
as 1:2019cv00659
Plaintiff:
Donell L. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs Mahlman, Ms. Behn and Mr. Distel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallant v. Erdos et al
as 1:2019cv00486
Defendant:
Officer A. Cooper, Officer M. Ervin, Officer T. Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy P. Gallant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin Triplett v. Daniel Hemphill, et al
as 19-3478
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMIE SMITH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MAJIDAH C. SMITH, in their individual and official capacities, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DANIEL B. HEMPHILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERVIN TRIPLETT
Gallant v. Erdos et al
as 2:2019cv02472
Defendant:
Officer M. Ervin, 12 Jon/ Jane Doe, Lt Dyer and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy P. Gallant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallant v. Erdos et al
as 1:2019cv00466
Defendant:
Officer M. Ervin, Lt. P. Frazie, 12 Jon/ Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy P. Gallant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Triplett v. Hemphill et al
as 2:2019cv00789
Defendant:
Daniel B. Hemphill, Warden J. Noble, Captain C. Distel and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin Triplett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome McDougald v. Esham, et al
as 17-3359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME MCDOUGALD
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ESHAM, LIEUTENANT JOSEPH, CORRECTIONS OFFICER QUEEN and others
Terry Pullen, Jr. v. Maynard, et al
as 16-4154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY TYRONE PULLEN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
C.O. MAYNARD, C.O. BUTTERBAUGH and C.O. DISTEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
