Cases 1 - 10 of 1,035
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00492
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00493
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Stout v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Izzah Stout
Defendant:
Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stout v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Izzah Stout
Defendant:
Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00075
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
McIntyre v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Defendant:
United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service doing business as IRS Agent John Does 1-100, Deputy Assistant Attorney General doing business as David A Hubbert and Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Revenue doing business as Shawn Jessy, DOR Agent
Plaintiff:
Joshua V. McIntyre
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Payton v. Grayson County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Grayson County, Kentucky doing business as Grayson County Detention Center and Officer John Doe 1-5
Plaintiff:
Barry Payton
Unknown:
Warning Order Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 5:2024cv00172
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
