Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hunt v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Hunt
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Priel, III v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2015cv00303
Plaintiff:
Alexander A Priel, III
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC and Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hohlt et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Sean Hohlt , Aaron Robinson and Robert Heaney
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hohlt et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sean Hohlt , Aaron Robinson , Robert Heaney and others
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raver v. Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York et al
as 2:2012cv00830
Plaintiff:
J. Kay Raver
Defendant:
Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and Monro Muffler Brake Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
William Mcaninch, et al v. Monroe Muffler Brake Inc
as 11-3753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MCANINCH, CASEY WHEELER and MARK IZZO
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE MUFFLER BRAKE INC, c/o CT Corporation System Statutory Agent
Mcaninch et al v. Monroe Muffler Brake Inc
as 2:2009cv00989
Plaintiff:
William Mcaninch, William Mcaninch, Casey Wheeler and others
Defendant:
Monroe Muffler Brake Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hinkfus v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 3:2007cv02163
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Hinkfus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
