Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 95
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al
as 24-3275
Plaintiff: JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
Almasy, et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al.
as 4:2024cv00452
Plaintiff: Patricia Almasy, Nina Aquino, Raeann Bankston and others
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Oxy Vinyls, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ceramfab, Inc. et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al.
as 4:2023cv02206
Plaintiff: Ceramfab, Inc., Ceramsource, Inc, Yonggong, LLC and others
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Hennessy et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2023cv02655
Plaintiff: Kevin Hennessy and Patrice Hennessy
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation and ABC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK v. SAKTHI AUTOMOTIVE GROUP USA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10890
Defendant: SAKTHI AUTOMOTIVE GROUP USA, INC., SAKTHI REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, INC., SAKTHI AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Interested Party: AAPICO Hitech PLC, General Motors LLC, Fessler & Bowman, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, The Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Intervenor Plaintiff: Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited and Punjab National Bank (International) Limited
Receiver: Kevin English
Not Classified By Court: Chase Invest Detroit Fund, LLC, Detroit Investment Fund, L.P., SMS Staffing Solutions, Inc. and others
Intervenor: Ford Motor Company
Claimant: Marcia Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Bucks County Employees Retirement System v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00982
Plaintiff: Bucks County Employees Retirement System
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Alan H. Shaw, James A. Squires and others
Petitioner: AkademikerPension and Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 Union Annuity, Pension and Topping Out Funds
State of Ohio v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00517
Plaintiff: State of Ohio and United States of America
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeff Franke, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-3848
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFF FRANKE, STEVEN FRYE and GREG FISH
Defendant / Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS and others
Kurtz, Jr. et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00529
Plaintiff: Robert Kurtz, Jr., Kurtz Tool and Die Co., Inc., Curt McAfee and others
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
United States of America v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al.
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?