Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Preston Mathis v. Dr. Baumann, et al
as 15-3350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON T. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. BAUMANN, DR. AIRALDI, MARTIN AKUSOBA and others
Christopher Bell v. Terry Tibbals, et al
as 14-3711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY TIBBALS, Warden, SHARON BERRY, JOHN DOE SWISHER and others
Bell v. Tibbals et al
as 1:2013cv02843
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Bell
Defendant:
Terry Tibbals, Sharon Berry, John Doe Swisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Baumann et al
as 1:2013cv01722
Plaintiff:
Preston T. Mathis
Defendant:
Dr. Baumann, Dr. Airaldi, Martin Akusoba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00986
Plaintiff:
Alan Francis
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Mansfield Correctional Institution, Mansfield Correction Institution Medical Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
David Roberts v. Gary Croft, et al
as 12-4106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY CROFT, ROB JEFFREYS, Warden, TERRY TIBBALS, Warden and others
Roberts v. Croft et al
as 1:2012cv00936
Plaintiff:
David W. Roberts
Defendant:
Gary Croft, Rob L. Jeffreys, Terry Tibbals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forester v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv02675
Plaintiff:
John W Forester
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Sharon Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forester v. Doe et al
as 2:2011cv01101
Plaintiff:
John W Forester
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Sharon Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwight Freeman v. Reginald Wilkerson, et al
as 10-4490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
REGINALD A. WILKERSON, Director, MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, CHERYL JERGENSON, Chief Inspector and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
