Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Vanblaricom v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03831
Plaintiff: William Robert Vanblaricom, II
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shade v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv02194
Plaintiff: William Robert Shade
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hutchinson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00854
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: William Robert Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grayson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06484
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Colleen Grayson and William Robert Grayson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Sheldon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00363
Petitioner: William Robert Dixon
Respondent: Ed Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Sheldon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02142
Petitioner: William Robert Dixon
Respondent: Ed Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Coleman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01476
Plaintiff: William Robert Dixon
Defendant: Coleman, Delacruz, Godsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Mohr et al
as 3:2015cv01999
Plaintiff: William Robert Dixon
Defendant: Gary Mohr, Paul Guyton, D. J. Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFee v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01812
Plaintiff: William Robert McFee
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. LeGrande et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00103
Petitioner: William Robert Dixon
Respondent: Robert LeGrande and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?