Cases 131 - 140 of 4,763
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Christopher Thompson, et al
as 24-1122
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALVARADO-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON, Warden, Pinckneyville CC, DUSTIN BOWLES, C/O, Pinckneyville CC, MAC-SHANE FRANK, Lieutenant, Pinckneyville CC and others
Juan Reyes v. Leonta Jackson, et al
as 24-1165
Plaintiff:
JUAN REYES
Defendant:
LEONTA JACKSON, Warden, MARY CERDA and TRAVIS BANTISTA
Quordalis Sanders v. Wisconsin Department of Community Corrections, et al
as 24-1159
Plaintiff:
QUORDALIS V. SANDERS
Defendant:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, BRIANN GERILER and JOHN DOES, sued as Johon Doe, transportation officers for DCC of Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Quordalis Sanders v. J. P. Stadtmueller
as 24-1210
Plaintiff:
QUORDALIS V. SANDERS
Defendant:
J. P. STADTMUELLER, Federal Judge
Willie Orr v. Zorian Trusewych, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
WILLIE D. ORR
Defendant:
ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH, Doctor, JESSICA GIVENS, PENNY SMITH and others
Virgil Griffin v. Douglas Wardlow, et al
as 24-1145
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL E. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
DOUGLAS WARDLOW, Major, Correctional Officer, individually and in their official capacity, DUJUAN D. LOTT, Sergeant, Lieutenant, Correctional Officer, individually and in their official capacity, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., Commissioner, individually and in their official capacity and others
Loren Tidwell v. Nancy Marthakis, et al
as 24-1049
Plaintiff:
LOREN W. TIDWELL
Defendant:
NANCY MARTHAKIS, TIFFANY TURNER and JACQUELINE M. MONACO
Monzer Al Kassar v. Bryant McGee, et al
as 24-1376
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL KASSAR
Defendant:
BRYANT MCGEE, ANDREW MOULTON, JOHN HUGHES and others
Michael Lee, Jr. v. Darwin Chentnik
as 24-1072
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LEE, JR.
Defendant:
DARWIN W. CHENTNIK
Lee Brown v. Cheryl Eplett, et al
as 24-1248
Plaintiff:
LEE A. BROWN
Defendant:
CHERYL EPLETT, Warden, EMIL TONEY and JOHN/JANE DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
