Cases 71 - 80 of 196
Charles A. Brooks v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 15-3677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES A. BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MCFADDEN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director and others
Patrick Thelen v. James Cross, Jr., et al
as 15-3665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK THELEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES CROSS, JR., Warden, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Charles A. Brooks v. USA, et al
as 15-3676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES A. BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director
Mark Richmond v. LABR, et al
as 15-3499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK RICHMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE LEMMON, Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner and others
Robert Tatum v. USA
as 15-3291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. TATUM, on behalf of Blacks (African Americans)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Lewis v. USA, et al
as 15-3195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Michael Sheneman v. Barbara Brook, et al
as 15-3108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHENEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA Z. BROOK, AUSA, in her official and personal capacities, JESSE M. BARRETT, AUSA, in his official and personal capacities, DAVID A. CAPP, AUSA, in his official and personal capacities and others
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 15-2871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN J. JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PORTER COUNTY JAIL, KANKAKEE COUNTY JAIL and others
Jack Mann v. USA
as 15-2769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK MANN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jack Mann v. USA
as 15-2769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK MANN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
