Cases 91 - 100 of 123
Constance Bryant v. Christine Oliver, et al
as 11-3501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONSTANCE BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE OLIVER, DAVID COLEMAN, STANLEY DAVIS, personally, individually and severally doing business as COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED and others
Tonya Cherry v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 11-3356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONYA M. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY and AGATHA COLEMAN, Targeted Case Manager
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brad Lieberman v. Compass Group U.S.A., Incorpo, et al
as 11-3014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAD LIEBERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMPASS GROUP U.S.A., INCORPORATED, by and through its Canteen Correctional Services Division, MICHAEL FORTUNATO, President, DIANE WALLACE, Dietary Manager and others
Joseph M. Rizzo v. DuPage County, et al
as 11-2068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. RIZZO
Defendant - Appellee:
DUPAGE COUNTY, JOSEPH E. BIRKETT, Former State's Attorney of DuPage County, Illinois, THOMAS O'CONNOR, Former Assistant State's Attorney of DuPage County, Illinois and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kirti Mehta v. Beaconridge Home Improvement A, et al
as 11-1505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRTI A. MEHTA
Defendant - Appellee:
BEACONRIDGE HOME IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION & ITS BOARD, TOM WANGLER, President; Individually & collectively as an employee, MARY M. RENNELS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
