Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rousemary Vega, et al v. Chicago Board of Education, et al
as 23-1183
Plaintiff:
ROUSEMARY VEGA and JESUS RAMOS
Appellant:
SHAW LEGAL SERVICES, LTD. and CARYN I. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO BOARD OF EDUCATION, JADINE CHOU, in her individual and official capacity, MAHALIA HINES, in her individual and official capacity and others
Terrance Shaw v. Brian Chapman, et al
as 22-2419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW and TERRANCE JAMES SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN CHAPMAN, TONYEKA NOEL and TODD THILLEMANN
Terrance Shaw v. Paul Kemper, et al
as 22-1707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL S. KEMPER, Warden, JACK F. CHIOVATERO, RANDY MILLER and others
Terrance Shaw v. Brian Chapman, et al
as 22-1134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN CHAPMAN, TONYEKA NOEL and TODD THILLEMANN
Cecil Shaw v. Kurt Osmondson
as 18-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL SHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
KURT OSMONDSON, Doctor
Ronald Olson, et al v. County of Champaign, Illinois, et al
as 12-3742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD OLSON and CINDY OLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN WALSH, Sheriff of Champaign County in his individual and official capacities, COUNTY OF CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS, an Illinois local governmental entity, TONY SHAW, Deputy Sheriff Champaign County in his individual capacity and others
Ricardo Pittman v. Village of Dolton, et al
as 09-4084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF ANDERSON J. WARD P.C., ANDERSON J. WARD, LETHEAL N. JOHNSON and others
Ricardo Pittman v. Village of Dolton, et al
as 09-2234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
VILLAGE OF DOLTON, WILLIAM SHAW, EVANGELINE LEVISON and others
Ronald Burge v. Village of Dolton, et al
as 08-3470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BURGE
Defendant - Appellee:
VILLAGE OF DOLTON, WILLIAM THOMAS and WILLIAM SHAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
