Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Martin Jonassen v. Clifford Johnson, et al
as 16-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN J. JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON, Warden, JOSHUA BERNS, Correctional Officer and BRYAN BENOIT, Correctional Officer
Martin Jonassen v. Clifford Johnson, et al
as 15-3819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN J. JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON, Warden, JOSHUA BERNS, Correctional Officer and BRYAN BENOIT, Correctional Officer
Clifford Shull v. Donald Enloe
as 15-3480
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD W. SHULL
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD ENLOE, Warden
Martin Jonassen v. Clifford Johnson, et al
as 15-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN J. JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON, Warden, JOSHUA BERNS, Correctional Officer and BRYAN BENOIT, Correctional Officer
Martin Jonassen v. USMS, et al
as 15-1751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN J. JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KANKAKEE COUNTY JAIL and others
Lee Smith v. Lieutenant Steele, et al
as 12-2397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT STEELE, Lieutenant, Internal Affairs, E. MASON, Correctional Officer, Internal Affairs, LIEUTENANT LIVINGSTON, Lieutenant, Chairman of Adjustment Committee and others
Nathan Antoine v. Anthony Ramos, et al
as 11-1807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN ANTOINE
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY RAMOS, CHARLES MCDANIEL, Sergeant, ROBERT M. ROBERTSON and others
Clifford Wilbourn-El v. USA, et al
as 09-2522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD WILBOURN-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Clifford Mikels v. John Evans
as 09-1449
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD E. MIKELS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden, Big Muddy River Correctional Center
Clifford Lawson, Jr. v. USA
as 08-4183
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD K. LAWSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
