Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Michael McGowan v. John Gardner, et al
as 09-2991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCGOWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN GARDNER, Contractor/Doctor, DOCTOR CHAPMAN, Dental Director, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, Chief Administrative Officer and others
Maurice McDonald v. Adrian Feinerman, et al
as 09-1855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN FEINERMAN, Medical Director, UNKNOWN PARTY, Unit Counselor, Paramedic, Grievance Officer and Gallery Officer, LT MITCHELL, C/O and others
Maurice McDonald v. A. Feinerman, et al
as 09-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN FEINERMAN, Medical Director, UNKNOWN PARTY, Unit Counselor, Paramedic, Grievance Officer and Gallery Officer, LT MITCHELL, C/O and others
Matthew Johnson v. Alfred Garcia, et al
as 09-1328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFRED GARCIA, M.D., ROSALINA GONZALES, M.D., ADRIAN FEINERMAN, M.D. and others
Anthony English v. Kevin Smith, et al
as 08-3629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY ENGLISH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN SMITH, Dr., LAWRENCE NGU, Dr., BARBARA MILLER and others
Adrian Riggs v. Brett Mize
as 08-2870
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN D. RIGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
BRETT MIZE
Larry Harris v. Martha Fluckie, et al
as 08-2127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY G. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWELL BROWN, GARY L. CONDER, ADRIAN FEINERMAN, sued as Dr. Finnerman and others
Adrian Lotaki v. Walter Martin
as 08-1922
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN LOTAKI
Respondent - Appellee:
WALTER E. MARTIN
Adrian Johnson v. USA
as 08-1777
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN T. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Hattery v. Health Care Professionals Limi, et al
as 08-1665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HATTERY
Defendant - Appellee:
HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS LIMITED and ADRIAN FEINERMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
