Cases 31 - 40 of 152
Robert Barnes v. Amy Campenelli, et al
as 17-1721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
AMY P. CAMPENELLI, NEIL L. TOPPEL, JASON M. MENARD and others
Firas Ayoubi v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 17-1662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIRAS M. AYOUBI
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, CONNIE MENNELLA, CARLOS ALTEZ and others
Larry Goodman v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 17-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Larry Goodman v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 17-1343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Steven Podkulski v. Thereasa Olson, et al
as 17-1116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN J. PODKULSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
THEREASA OLSON, THOMAS J. DART, RAHM EMANUEL and others
Dwayne Sandress v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board, et al
as 16-4110
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWAYNE SANDRESS, also known as MICHAEL JOSEPH, N61217
Respondent - Appellee:
ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BOARD and NNEKA JONES TAPIA, Director, Executive Director, Cook County Jail
Darren Hopkins v. Thomas Dart
as 16-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN L. HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Cook County Sheriff
Kirk Thompson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 16-3948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK A. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Christopher Wyma v. Daniel Nolan, et al
as 16-3140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER W. WYMA
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL F. NOLAN, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COOK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Carl Thomas, et al v. People of the State of Illinoi, et al
as 16-2292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL THOMAS and SELBY OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ANITA ALVAREZ, Cook County States Attorney and RAHM EMANUEL, City of Chicago Mayor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
