Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Mark Johnson v. Anthony Ramos
as 09-2962
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY RAMOS, Acting Warden
Jeremiah Betts v. Anthony Ramos
as 09-2786
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMIAH BETTS
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK L. SHAW and ANTHONY RAMOS
Tony Shoultz v. Anthony Ramos
as 09-2125
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY SHOULTZ
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK L. SHAW and ANTHONY RAMOS
David Carter v. Marcus Hardy
as 09-1934
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID CARTER
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY MCCANN, ANTHONY RAMOS and MARCUS HARDY, Warden
Maurice McDonald v. Adrian Feinerman, et al
as 09-1855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN FEINERMAN, Medical Director, UNKNOWN PARTY, Unit Counselor, Paramedic, Grievance Officer and Gallery Officer, LT MITCHELL, C/O and others
Maurice McDonald v. D. Porter, et al
as 09-1781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
D. PORTER, Correctional Officer, Internal Affairs, UNKNOWN PARTY, Phychiatrist Melissa, RAMOS, Associate Warden and others
Maurice McDonald v. A. Feinerman, et al
as 09-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN FEINERMAN, Medical Director, UNKNOWN PARTY, Unit Counselor, Paramedic, Grievance Officer and Gallery Officer, LT MITCHELL, C/O and others
Maurice McDonald v. D. Porter, et al
as 09-1731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
D. PORTER, Correctional Officer, Internal Affairs, UNKNOWN PARTY, Phychiatrist Melissa, RAMOS, Associate Warden and others
Irving Cross v. Marcus Hardy
as 09-1666
Petitioner - Appellant:
IRVING L. CROSS
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY MCCANN, ANTHONY RAMOS and MARCUS HARDY, Warden
Jerry Mahaffey v. Anthony Ramos
as 08-3916
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY MAHAFFEY
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY MCCANN and ANTHONY RAMOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
