Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Bradley Cox v. John Doe 1, et al
as 23-2977
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY M. COX
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, Director of FBI, JASON STEWART and JOSEPH GASS
Bobby Tatum v. Correctional Officer Hunter, et al
as 23-2253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY TATUM
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUNTER, LIEUTENANT BRADFORD, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Andrew Helmueller v. L. Wilson, et al
as 23-1962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JACOB HELMUELLER, also known as Sovereignty Joseph Helmueller Sovereign Freeman
Defendant / Appellee:
L. WILSON, TONIA MOON, M. GREENWOOD and others
Ty'Shawn Gilmore v. Brian Anderson, et al
as 22-2989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TY'SHAWN K. GILMORE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN ANDERSON, JONATHAN BARRY, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Robert Conner v. Oscar Martinez, et al
as 22-2772
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT D. CONNER
Defendant / Appellee:
OSCAR MARTINEZ, Lake County Sheriff, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA, SEBENS, Officer, Lake County Corrections Officer and others
Henry Gill v. J.B. Pritzker, et al
as 22-1162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY GILL
Defendant / Appellee:
J.B. PRITZKER, CRAIG FINDLEY, ANGIE ASHBROCK and others
Harvey Larson v. City of Kenosha, Wisconsin, et al
as 18-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARVEY E. LARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KENOSHA, WISCONSIN, JOHN DOE 1, sued as Public Defender John Doe, JOHN DOE 2, sued as Prosecutor John Doe and others
James Goston v. Thomas Fecarotta, et al
as 17-3537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. GOSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. FECAROTTA, WILLIAM MAKI, MARIA MCCARTHY and others
Edward Johnson, III v. Robert Redmond, et al
as 17-3352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JOHNSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT REDMOND, SERGEANT FERNANDEZ and JOHN DOES, 1-6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
