Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jovan Williams v. Kristin Jensen, et al
as 21-3407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOVAN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTIN J. JENSEN, WAYNE R. NYIRI, SUSAN PETERS and others
Jovan Battle v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 18-1980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDY PFISTER, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Jovan Battle v. Bruce Faulkner, et al
as 18-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE FAULKNER, The supervisor of field services for NRC, RANDY PFISTER, The Head Warden, JOHN DOE, The field service employee #1 and others
Jovan Battle v. State of Illinois, et al
as 18-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, JOHN DOE, Sgt.(3-11 shift), RANDY PFISTER and others
Jovan Battle v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 18-1820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATEVILLE NRC MENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, RANDY PFISTER and others
Jovan Battle v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 18-1822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, NRC Head, Warden, OFFICER ROMANN, 3 to 11 Shift, OFFICER GARDNER, 3 to 11 Shift and others
Jovan Battle v. Officer Luster
as 17-2745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER LUSTER, Metra Police Department
Jovan Battle v. Tina Jepsen, et al
as 17-2322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
TINA JEPSEN, Healthcare Unit Admistrator, CHRISTINE BRANNON, Warden, Warden, EAST MOLINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Medical Administration and others
Jovan Stewart v. USA
as 15-2025
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOVAN D. STEWART
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jovan Daniels v. Saleh Obaisi, et al
as 15-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALEH OBAISI, Doctor and ALETHA HARPER, Nurse
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
