Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Shannon Agofsky v. BOP, et al
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Andre' Drew v. Unit Case Manager Murphy, et al
as 24-1116
Plaintiff:
ANDRE' DREW
Defendant:
UNIT CASE MANAGER MURPHY, INSTRUCTOR SHAW, Drug Education Coordinator, COORDINATOR GAUTHIER, Drug Treatment Program and others
Terrance Alden v. BOP, et al
as 23-2229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE ALDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jack Morgan v. BOP, et al
as 22-2731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK WILLIAM MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN CIOLLI
Robert Decker v. BOP
as 22-2475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Fairly Earls v. BOP
as 22-2023
Petitioner / Appellant:
FAIRLY W. EARLS
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
John Heard, Jr. v. Mark Inch
as 17-3072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN F. HEARD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK S. INCH, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Jermel Pope v. M. Hewitt, et al
as 17-2875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMEL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. HEWITT, Mailroom Supervisor, JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director and others
Philip Sebolt v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 17-2845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, Director of FBOP; is sued in his individual and official capacities, MELISSA J. BAYLESS, Former Unit Manager of D-Unit, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Former Director of BOP; sued in his individual capacity and others
Johnny Gregory v. Tony Chamness, et al
as 17-2718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY CHAMNESS, Unit Manager, FPC Marion, JEFF BANEY, Camp Administrator, FPC Marion, WEASEL BRADLEY, Counselor, FPC Marion and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
