Cases 11 - 19 of 19
David Johnson v. Lynette Thompson-Smith, et al
as 16-3559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNETTE THOMPSON-SMITH, in her individual capacity, RONALD A. RASCIA, in his individual capactiy, WILLIAM BLUMTHAL, in his individual capactiy and others
David M. Johnson v. Lynette Thompson-Smith, et al
as 16-3255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNETTE THOMPSON-EDWARDS, in her individual capacity, RONALD A. RASCIA, in his individual capactiy, WILLIAM BLUMTHAL, in his individual capactiy and others
David Johnson v. Lynette Thompson-Edwards, et al
as 16-2495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNETTE THOMPSON-EDWARDS, in her individual lcapacity, RONALD A. RASCIA, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM BLUMTHAL, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Johnson v. John Tharp, Jr.
as 15-2452
Petitioner:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN J. THARP, JR.
Party-in-Interest:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, TANYA JENSEN, BLANE J. BRUMMOND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David M. Johnson v. John Z. Lee
as 15-1683
Petitioner:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN Z. LEE
Party-in-Interest:
JACOB J. LEW, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury, SERGIO ARELLANO, SUSAN J. KASS and others
David Johnson v. Melton Truck Lines, Incorpora, et al
as 14-3656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MELTON TRUCK LINES, INCORPORATED, ROBERT A. PETERSON, MICHAEL DARGEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
