Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Direct Digital, LLC v. Vince Mullins
as 14-8026
Petitioner:
DIRECT DIGITAL, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
VINCE MULLINS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
USA v. Rick Boro
as 14-2718
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICK BOROS, also known as VINCE KWIATKOWSKI
USA v. Manuel Leija-Sanchez
as 14-1584
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL LEIJA-SANCHEZ, also known as ENRIQUE FELIX, also known as REGLAS, also known as MIGUELITO, also known as VINCENTE VINCE, also known as MARCOS ZAMORA, also known asAGUILAR, also known as MOCO, also known as MANUEL SANCHEZ-LEIJA, also known as RICARD
Vincent Peters v. Kanye West, et al
as 11-1708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT PETERS, professionally known as VINCE P.
Defendant - Appellee:
KANYE WEST, ROC-A-FELLA RECORDS, LLC and UMG RECORDINGS, INCORPORATED
USA v. Ricky Boro
as 10-2566
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICKY BOROS, also known as VINCE KWIATKOWSKI
Scot Vince v. Rock County, Wisconsin, et al
as 10-1659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOT VINCE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN, LORENZO HENDERSON, in his individual capacity and as a City of Beloit Police Officer, TOM NIMAN, in his individual capacity and as the Rock County District Attorney Investigator and others
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Incorporat v. Vince Barrett
as 09-3487
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
VINCE F. BARRETT, also known as VINCE KONICEK, doing business as WWW.TOPROLEXREPLICA.COM
Hillard Quint v. Village of Deerfield, et al
as 09-2508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HILLARD J. QUINT
Defendant - Appellee:
VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD, a municipal corporation, JUAN MAZARIEGOS, individually and as an agent of the City of Deerfield and VINCE NICHOLS, individually and as an agent of the City of Deerfield
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
