Cases 21 - 30 of 30
USA v. Dong Guo
as 11-3392
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONG D. GUO, also known, as XIAO ZHANG
Michael Holloway v. Parhasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 11-2337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HOLLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
PARHASARATHI GHOSH, LIPING ZHANG and ALLEN KARRAKER
Jiade Zhang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-2903
Petitioner:
JIADE ZHANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Kedron Jones, Jr. v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 10-2029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEDRON JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, KEVIN HALLORAN, Chief Executive Officer of Wexford Health Sources, Incorporated, ALLAN KARRAKER, Regional Administrator of Wexford Health Sources, Incorporated and others
Jun Zhang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-1235
Petitioner:
JUN ZHEN ZHANG
Respondent:
MARK R. FILIP and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Donald Mascio v. Doctor Garlick, et al
as 09-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD MASCIO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN GARLICK, SOBEREKON KOKO, Doctor, SCOTT BAKER and others
Shi Tu Zheng v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-1071
Petitioner:
SHI TU ZHENG and FANG ZHENG, also known as MEI ZHANG, also known as FANG SHENG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MARK R. FILIP and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Tian Zhang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-3684
Petitioner:
TIAN Y. ZHANG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MARK R. FILIP and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Jianzhong Zhang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-2398
Petitioner:
JIANZHONG ZHANG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MARK R. FILIP and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Qiu Zhang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-1131
Petitioner:
QIU H. ZHANG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MARK R. FILIP and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
