Cases 41 - 50 of 217
John A. Hawkins v. Robert E. Carter, Jr., et al
as 21-2228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. HAWKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., RON NEAL, CAPTAIN BOOTZ and others
Walter Smith v. Sandra Hautamaki, et al
as 21-2004
Defendant / Appellee:
BELINDA SCHRUBBE, BRUCE MURASKI, Captain, MICHAEL THURMER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER SMITH
Ronnie Martin v. Metropolitan Correctional Cen, et al
as 21-1923
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ROBINSON, of MCC Chicago, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE MARTIN
David DeBauche v. Wisconsin Department of Correc, et al
as 21-1784
Defendant / Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL DITTMAN, Warden, MARY LEISER, Inmate Complaint Examiner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID D. DEBAUCHE
Antwan Slater v. Nicole Lervik, et al
as 21-1560
Defendant / Appellee:
NICOLE LERVIK, LUCAS WEBER, Captain, KEVIN W. PITZEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN SLATER
Brandon Bradley v. Susan Novak, et al
as 21-1008
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCAS WEBER, Captain, M. LEISER, L. ODONOVAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON BRADLEY
Bernell Kelly v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 20-3455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BERNELL E. KELLY
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HSU STAFF, CAPTAIN SCHULTZ and others
USA v. Ronald Tingle
as 20-3401
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD TINGLE, also known as CAPTAIN RON, also known as CAP
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carlton Landis v. Chris Rivers, et al
as 20-3360
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN KIRBY, ASSOCIATE WARDEN DOERER and CHRIS RIVERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON T. LANDIS
Calvin Pirtle v. Dave Brooks, et al
as 20-3289
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE BROOKS and STEVEN SCHUELER, Captain
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN J. PIRTLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
