Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Lorenzo Wilson v. James Rundle, et al
as 16-2429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUNDLE, DUANE PRICE and RORY SHAW
Darlene Sheils v. GateHouse Media, Inc., et al
as 16-1720
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DARLENE SHEILS
Defendant - Appellant:
GATEHOUSE MEDIA, INC., also known as GATEHOUSE MEDIA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS, INC., GATEHOUSE MEDIA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS, INC. and SHAW SUBURBAN MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Patrick Tullis v. Vipin Shaw, et al
as 16-1130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK TULLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
VIPIN SHAW, Doctor, Medical Director and M.D. at Pinckneyville Correctional Center, ALLAN MARTIN, Warden at Shawnee Correctional Center, KENDRA SEIP, Grievance officer/counselor Unit 2 with Shawnee Correctional Center and others
Stephen Couch v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 15-2881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN COUCH
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, Western CC, DEBORAH FUQUA, Health Care Unit Administrator and others
Donald Rathbone v. Sam Quio, et al
as 15-2306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD RATHBONE
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM QUIO, BRIAN L. SHAW, Assistant State's Attorney and JOHN BELZ
Roger Greenfield, et al v. Gus Paloian, et al
as 14-3643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER GREENFIELD and THEODORE KASEMIR
Defendant - Appellee:
GUS ANTHONY PALOIAN, individually and SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Terrance J. Shaw v. Judy P. Smith
as 14-2893
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDY P. SMITH
USA v. Norman Shaw, Jr.
as 14-2881
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NORMAN SHAW, JR.
Norman Shaw, Jr. v. Counselor Nietzer, et al
as 14-2084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN SHAW, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNSELOR NIETZER, COUNSELOR HINMAN, J. POISAL, Secretary and others
Norman Shaw, Jr. v. James Shadid
as 14-1856
Petitioner:
NORMAN SHAW, JR.
Respondent:
JAMES E. SHADID
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
