Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Gregory White v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 16-2970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY A. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, Senior Public Service Administrator and DANIELLE WALKER
Donald Lehn v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 16-2916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD A. LEHN
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, Program Director and BRUCE V. RAUNER, Governor
Craig Childress v. Gregg Scott
as 16-2093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. CHILDRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT
Michael Hughes v. James Dimas, et al
as 16-1818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DIMAS, Secretary, GREGG SCOTT, Senior Program Director, LIBERTY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION and others
Danny Schwab v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 16-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY R. SCHWAB
Defendant - Appellee:
FORREST J. ASHBY, REGGY BARNETT, CHARLOTTA MORRIS, Security Therapy Aide and others
Lawrence Lingle v. Alfreda Kibby, et al
as 16-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE LINGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFREDA KIBBY, EUGENE MCADORY, SHAN JUMPER and others
Walter Pegues v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 16-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER PEGUES
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, Senior Public Service Administrator, DANIELLE WALKER, Director of Nursing, SHON C. ORRILL and others
Walter Pegues v. James Dimas, et al
as 16-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER PEGUES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DIMAS, Secretary of the Illinois Department of Human Services, GREGG SCOTT, Senior Program Director, LIBERTY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION and others
Michael Lemberger v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 16-1316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEMBERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, Senior Public Service Administrator, DANIELLE WALKER, Director of Nursing and THOMAS REINHARDT, Security Staff Employee
Lawrence Hayes v. Gregg Scott
as 16-1262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
