Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Nahum Sanchez-Villagomez v. Marc Clement
as 15-1177
Petitioner - Appellant:
NAHUM SANCHEZ-VILLAGOMEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
MARC CLEMENTS
Humberto Sanchez-Rengifo v. J. Caraway
as 14-2876
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUMBERTO SANCHEZ-RENGIFO
Respondent - Appellee:
J. F. CARAWAY
USA v. Julio Leija-Sanchez
as 14-1589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIO LEIJA-SANCHEZ, also known as LARRY, ROGELIO GARCIA-SALAZAR, CESAR JUAREZ, SALIVAS, SAVINO ZAPIEL, ROGELIO GARCIA, ADRIAN PEREZ-BENITEZ and CARLOS BECERRA VELASQUEZ
USA v. Manuel Leija-Sanchez
as 14-1584
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL LEIJA-SANCHEZ, also known as ENRIQUE FELIX, also known as REGLAS, also known as MIGUELITO, also known as VINCENTE VINCE, also known as MARCOS ZAMORA, also known asAGUILAR, also known as MOCO, also known as MANUEL SANCHEZ-LEIJA, also known as RICARD
Fredy Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-2653
Petitioner:
FREDY ARNOLDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Galdino Martinez-Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-1885
Petitioner:
GALDINO MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Francis Sanchez
as 12-3297
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCIS X. SANCHEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2767
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
AgroExport LLC, et al v. Bacchus Fresh International, I, et al
as 12-1782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AGROEXPORT LLC, SANCHEZ HAS AVOCADO CORP, RIO QUEEN CITRUS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BACCHUS FRESH INTERNATIONAL, INC. and TOM LANGE COMPANY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
