Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Anikka King v. Tom Broderick, et al
as 23-1584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANIKKA KING
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM BRODERICK and CITY OF ANDERSON, INDIANA
USA v. Broderick Moore
as 23-1147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRODERICK MOORE
Tyquan Stewart v. Matthew Loughran, et al
as 19-2513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYQUAN STEWART
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN BRODERICK, also known as Brian Brodrick, BLOOMBERG BNA and MATTHEW LOUGHRAN
Carmen Wallace, et al v. Grubhub Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-1564
Defendant / Appellee:
GRUBHUB, INC. and GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMEN WALLACE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and BRODERICK BRYANT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Willie Pettengill, et al v. Broderick Cameron, et al
as 18-1947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE R. PETTENGILL, individuall and next friend of ENP, a minor, CHRISTOPHER L. PETTENGILL and BRIDGET R. PETTENGILL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRODERICK CAMERON, Honorable, DEBORAH ASHER, RITA RAIHLE and others
USA v. Broderick Moore
as 17-3575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRODERICK MOORE
Julian Nettles-Bey v. Philip Williams, et al
as 15-2704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JULIAN T. NETTLES-BEY
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILIP WILLIAMS, Officer and BRODERICK BURKE, Officer
USA v. Broderick Jones
as 15-2555
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRODERICK JONES
Julie McArdle v. Peoria School District 150, et al
as 11-2437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIE MCARDLE
Defendant - Appellee:
PEORIA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 150, an Illinois Local Government Entity, KEN HINTON, in his official and individual capacities, THOMAS BRODERICK, in his individual capacities and others
Broderick White v. Virginia Kendall
as 10-2278
Petitioner:
BRODERICK WHITE
Respondent:
VIRGINIA M. KENDALL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
