Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patrick Delices v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin
as 23-1594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK DELICES
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF REGENTS and BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nigel Noll v. Board of Regents of the Unive, et al
as 21-3176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NIGEL NOLL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM, B. BRADFORD BROWN, Doctor and HALEY VLACH
Sabina Burton v. Board of Regents of the Unive, et al
as 20-2910
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM, MELISSA GORMLEY, STACI STROBL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SABINA LEIGH BURTON
Sabina Burton v. Board of Regents of the Unive, et al
as 20-1579
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS CAYWOOD, MICHAEL DALECKI, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SABINA LEIGH BURTON
UWM Student Association, et al v. Michael Lovell, et al
as 17-2499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UVM STUDENT ASSOCIATION, LENA-ROSE M. ABU SAIF, ANDRES G. AGUILAR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LOVELL, Doctor, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM, STUDENT ASSOCIATION AT UWM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scott Lyons v. Board of Regents of the Unive, et al
as 15-1219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM and WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE TRUST FUNDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
