Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richard Bilik v. Robert Shearing, et al
as 20-1323
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MOLDENHAUER, ROBERT SHEARING, Doctor, JOHN TROST, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD BILIK
Kenneth Daugherty v. Richard Harrington, et al
as 17-3224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH JAMES DAUGHERTY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HARRINGTON and KEVIN PAGE
Dion Spears v. Robert Shearing, et al
as 16-4269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DION SPEARS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SHEARING, Doctor, Menard Correctional Center, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and RICHARD HARRINGTON, Warden/Chief Administration Officer, Menard Correctional Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roderick T. Allen v. Correctional Officer Bower, et al
as 14-2249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK T. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOWER, Menard Correctional Center, RICHARD HARRINGTON, Warden, Menard Correctional Center, MICHELLE L. GROOVES and others
John Cordrey v. Richard Harrington, et al
as 14-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. CORDREY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HARRINGTON, Warden at Menard Prison, ALEX JONES, Assistant Warden of Operations at Menard Prison, L. PHELPS, Correctional Officer/Internal Affairs Investigator at Menard Prison and others
Robert Gacho v. Richard Harrington
as 13-3911
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT GACHO
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD HARRINGTON
Hector Cortez v. Richard Harrington
as 13-3852
Petitioner - Appellant:
HECTOR CORTEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD HARRINGTON
Sherman Gibson v. Richard Harrington
as 13-2229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERMAN GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HARRINGTON, Warden
Audie Murphy v. Marcus Hardy, et al
as 13-1095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDIE C. MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS HARDY, Warden, DARRYL COLEMAN, RANDY PFISTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
