Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Charles Florance v. Carol Barnett, et al
as 23-1453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES W. FLORANCE and CHARLES FLORANCE
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL C. BARNETT, JOSE R. ESPADA, THOMAS M. EVERETT and others
Chicago Wine Company, et al v. Eric Holcomb, et al
as 21-2068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN WARNER, CYNTHIA SPRINGER, DENNIS M. NEARY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC HOLCOMB, WINE & SPIRITS DISTRIBUTORS OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA and others
Mikeal Stine v. J. Krueger, et al
as 19-1821
Defendant / Appellee:
J. DODGE, J. E. KRUEGER, Warden, T. J. WATSON, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEAL G. STINE
Rocio Herrera-Nevarez v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 18-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. SPRINGER, in his capacity as trustee of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of ROCIO HERRERA-NEVAREZ
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Thomas Springer v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 18-1851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. SPRINGER, in his capacity as trustee of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of ROCIO HERRERA-NEVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
John Gleason v. Chris Jansen
as 17-1658
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: CHRISTOPHER JANSEN
Appellant:
JOHN M. GLEASON
Trustee:
THOMAS E. SPRINGER
Nguyen Buren, et al v. Doctor's Associates Inc., et al
as 16-1652
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NGUYEN BUREN, JASON LESLIE, RICHARD SPRINGER and others
Appellant:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC., doing business as SUBWAY, SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INCORPORATED, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anthony Martin v. George Nicklow, et al
as 12-1934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE NICKLOW, BEN SPRINGER and JOHN DRUMMER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
