Cases 41 - 50 of 11,291
Edwards v. USA
as 1:2024cv01307
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenin Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rosenbaum v. Warden, FPC Pekin
as 1:2024cv01305
Respondent:
Warden, FPC Pekin
Petitioner:
Aimee Lynn Rosenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Regan v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01303
Defendant:
Lisa Weitkamp, Mindi Nurse, LaToya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
John Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Mumbert et al
as 1:2024cv01304
Defendant:
John Doe, . Markley, Sarah Mumbert and others
Plaintiff:
Dataeyna Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Christian County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2024cv03236
Defendant:
Christian County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montezon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01301
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Danielle Smith
Petitioner:
Tina Montezon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newcomer v. Greene
as 4:2024cv04160
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Brittany Greene
Petitioner:
Bostyn Newcomer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poch v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Defendant:
Lisa Draper, Ryan Bohm and John or Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Eric Poch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jacksonville Family Dentristry et al
as 3:2024cv03231
Defendant:
Jacksonville Family Dentristry and IDOC
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Bohm et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Defendant:
Lisa Draper, John/Jane Does, Ryan Bohm and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
