Cases 111 - 120 of 29,101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morris v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04195
Plaintiff:
Antonio Morris
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. doing business as Spark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris v. City of Naperville, Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv04196
Plaintiff:
Amara Harris
Defendant:
City of Naperville, Illinois, Juan Leon and Jonathan W Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2024cv04128
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Robert Wes Wheeler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Northwestern University
as 1:2024cv04125
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Northwestern University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Ortiz et al v. DCFS et al
as 1:2024cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ana Ortiz, Anthony Ortiz and Antonio Bryant
Defendant:
DCFS, Ruth Mejias, Theresa Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Streeter et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jovan Streeter and Marquita Beecham
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Kenneth Sunde, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
