Cases 121 - 130 of 247
Tyler Lewis v. Joliet Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Rosie Tyler Lewis
Defendant:
Joliet Police Department and Lois Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolden et al v. Kashirsky et al
as 1:2015cv10856
Plaintiff:
Derrick Bolden and Sharon Bolden
Defendant:
Mark Kashirsky , Investigator Lewis and Village of Riverdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prison Legal News v. County of Kane et al
as 1:2015cv09250
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News
Defendant:
County of Kane , Donald E. Kramer , Corey Hunger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Metro Enforcement et al
as 3:2015cv50264
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Metro Enforcement, Joshua Sims and Cory Magnuson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandy Thomas-Hayes v. Officer R. Lewis #558 et al
as 1:2015cv07384
Plaintiff:
Brandy Thomas-Hayes
Defendant:
R. Lewis, Officer Tilbert, City of Markham and others
Petitioner:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lacy v. Lewis et al
as 1:2015cv06129
Plaintiff:
Liddell Lacy
Defendant:
Ronnie Lewis, Kenmond Eng, Lawrence Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wedston v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv05965
Plaintiff:
Lewis Wedston
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , Officer M. Ali, #7241, Officer L. Shvarster, #17223 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. City of Markham et al
as 1:2015cv05109
Plaintiff:
Iris Edwards
Defendant:
City Of Markham and R. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Zion et al
as 1:2015cv04523
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis
Defendant:
City of Zion, Matthew du Chemin and Piotr Jamka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Officer Curia, et al
as 1:2015cv04339
Plaintiff:
Margo Lewis
Defendant:
Jeffrey Curia, Chicago City, Gabriel Barrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
