Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Perez v. Village of Forest Park et al
as 1:2016cv05441
Plaintiff:
Gladys Perez
Defendant:
Village of Forest Park , Eric Entler, Nick Treantafeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rasche et al v. Lane et al
as 1:2015cv07918
Defendant:
B.R. Lane , Illinois Department of the Lottery, The , Illinois Lottery Control Board and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Rasche and Daniel Chasteen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Abu-Humos v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2015cv06961
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Abu-Humos
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice , Barry Jonas , First Merit Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Neiman v. The Village of Deerfield et al
as 1:2015cv04300
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Neiman
Defendant:
The Village of Deerfield , Detective Bernas , Kimberly Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. City of Chicago Park District et al
as 1:2015cv03014
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ferguson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Park District, Bryan Traubert, Avis LaVelle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Lane v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv01920
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lane
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer John Doe and Officer Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights et al v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv07749
Plaintiff:
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights, Bruce E. Crosby, William K. Crosby and others
Defendant:
Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, Langdon D. Neal, Richard A. Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
