Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Mollet v. Hospital Sisters Health System et al
as 1:2016cv09238
Defendant:
Hospital Sisters Health System , Hospital Sisters Services, Inc. , Stephen J Bochenek and others
Plaintiff:
Holly Mollet
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
International Services, Inc. v. Braiman et al
as 1:2016cv07055
Plaintiff:
International Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Braiman, Cogent Analytics, LLC, f/k/a Braiman & Associates, LLC and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ebler et al v. Lee County et al
as 3:2016cv50167
Plaintiff:
John Ebler and Natalie Ebler
Defendant:
Lee County , City of Dixon and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company v. John P. Calamos, Sr. et al.
as 1:2011cv00462
Plaintiff:
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
John P Calamos, Sr , Nick P Calamos , Weston W Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv50152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
