Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Wakefield v. Scoble et al
as 3:2024cv02150
Defendant:
Dr. Ibraheim, Sue Mason, Megan Duiguid and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Schoenbeck et al
as 3:2024cv01807
Defendant:
Kelly Pierce, Anthony Wills, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01679
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe 4, Latoya Hughes, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P. Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Nottingham et al
as 3:2024cv01561
Defendant:
Amanda Smith, Calvin Pend, Lt Penn and others
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Jacob Horn, Counselor Moore, Sgt. Charleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. CMHC
as 3:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jacob Washington
Defendant:
CMHC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. Turman et al
as 3:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Gerald Scott Turman, Jacob D. Gettings, Mildred Louise Gettings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blankenship v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blankenship
Defendant:
Kaleb Johnson and Brian Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Blankenship v. Dudley et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blankenship
Defendant:
Joshua David Dudley and Brain Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rodgers v. McDonough et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Timothy P. Rodgers
Defendant:
Dennis McDonough, Department of Veterans Affairs, Joshua Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
