Cases 101 - 110 of 128
Becraft v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Eric D Becraft and Eric D Becraft
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Wilson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2007cv00528
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wilson, Darnell Wilson and Darnell Wilson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Madura v. Elgin Joliet and Eastern Railway Company
as 2:2007cv00338
Plaintiff:
Curt Madura
Defendant:
Elgin Joliet and Eastern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Grogg v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 1:2007cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lynford Grogg
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Vondrasek v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
as 3:2007cv00251
Plaintiff:
Tom Vondrasek
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Blankenship v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
Justin Blankenship, Justin Blankenship, Justin Blankenship and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Mediator:
John W Whiteleather, Jr
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Edsall v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 1:2006cv00389
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Kilander v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2006cv00375
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Sheets v. Chicago South Shore and South Bend Railroad
as 2:2006cv00313
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Lopez v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
as 1:2006cv00283
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
