Cases 31 - 40 of 11,396
Myles v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
John B Myles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunaway v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00441
Petitioner:
Chad A Dunaway
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Lyndon C Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Schererville Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Defendant:
Schererville Police Department, Schererville Police Dept, Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Khalil M Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Yoquelet v. Noble County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Yoquelet
Defendant:
Noble County Sheriffs Department, Jenny Cummins and Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkes v. Sweeny et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Defendant:
Nathaniel Sweeny, Lance Sands, Joshua Carder and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie DeVaughn Burkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Barry
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Christina Reagle, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Louis Lee Fisher
Defendant:
Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
English, Calvert and Christina Reagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
