Cases 61 - 70 of 127
PATTYN v. COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2015cv06028
Defendant:
COOK GROUP, INC., COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PATTYN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAUDBY v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, et al
as 1:2015cv01468
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAUDBY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JP EQUIPMENT, INC. v. ROSENBLATT et al
as 1:2015cv01435
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, DAVID R. ENTERPRISES, INC., JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
JP EQUIPMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01383
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00902
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HRHH HOTEL/CASINO, LLC et al v. BELLA VITA, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00791
Defendant:
BELLA VITA, LLC, DOES 1-10 and HENRI B. NAJEM, JR.
Plaintiff:
HRHH HOTEL/CASINO, LLC and HRHH IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BRESCIA v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Defendant:
ANTHEM COMPANIES, INC., ANTHEM, INC., DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
VALERIE BRESCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
