Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BECKMAN v. ATHENE ANNUITY AND LIFE COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00213
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP and ATHENE ANNUITY AND LIFE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN A. BECKMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FELDMAN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00909
Plaintiff:
STACY FELDMAN
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MATHIOUDAKIS v. UNUM GROUP
as 1:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MATHIOUDAKIS
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
EMSWILLER v. COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03095
Defendant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JASON EMSWILLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BUSSARD v. THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv02221
Plaintiff:
DAVID A BUSSARD
Defendant:
THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
KASHA v. THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. KASHA
Defendant:
THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
ROSZKOWSKI v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv01277
Plaintiff:
LINDA K. ROSZKOWSKI
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
DREW v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv01291
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. DREW
Defendant:
PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
LINDENBERG v. RYDER SYSTEM, INC. (THE) et al
as 3:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LINDENBERG
Defendant:
RYDER SYSTEM, INC. (THE), RYDER SYSTEM, INC. (THE), RYDER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
