Cases 11 - 20 of 17,896
Hub International Limited v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv04707
Plaintiff:
Hub International Midwest Limited
Defendant:
Clinton W Anderson and Artemis Risk Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Vargas v. Venture Transportation Partners, LLC d/b/a Venture Logistics
as 1:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Julio Vargas
Defendant:
Venture Transportation Partners, LLC d/b/a Venture Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
BMO BANK N.A. v. 1ST PRIORITY COURIER LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
BMO BANK N.A.
Defendant:
1ST PRIORITY COURIER LLC and SHELONDA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
R. Jeffrey & Associates, Inc. v. Temple Beth Am
as 1:2024cv04670
Plaintiff:
R. Jeffrey & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Temple Beth Am
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vermeer Midwest, Inc. v. Teupen North America, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Vermeer Midwest, Inc.
Defendant:
Teupen North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
R. v. Starr Austen Miller
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
G. R.
Defendant:
Starr Austen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jacoby v. Idlewild Country Club
as 1:2024cv02723
Plaintiff:
John Jacoby
Defendant:
Idlewild Country Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mango Community Family Farm v. A10 Trucking Corporation
as 1:2024cv02695
Plaintiff:
Mango Community Family Farm
Defendant:
A10 Trucking Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Rohlig USA, LLC v. Metro Decor, LLC, et al
as 1:2024cv04544
Plaintiff:
Rohlig USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Mata v. Amazon
as 3:2024cv50205
Plaintiff:
Christian J Mata
Defendant:
Amazon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
