Cases 21 - 30 of 45
CONRAD v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
DONNA CONRAD
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hatcher v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03720
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Hatcher
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Highland Park CVS, L.L.C., Highland Park CVS, L.L.C. doing business as CVS Pharmacy #8598 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daichendt et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03318
Plaintiff:
Denise Daichendt, Ada "June" Odell and Ada Odell
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gries v. Highland Park CVS, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2022cv01906
Plaintiff:
Lois Gries
Defendant:
Highland Park CVS, L.L.C. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kendziora v. Highland Park CVS, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2021cv06936
Plaintiff:
Judith Kendziora
Defendant:
Highland Park CVS, L.L.C., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Streamwood CVS, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. CVS Health Inc et al
as 2:2021cv02300
Plaintiff:
Erma Robinson
Defendant:
CVS Health Inc and CVS Pharmacy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klein v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.
as 1:2020cv03622
Plaintiff:
Shirely Klein
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc. and Highland Park CVS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01969
Plaintiff:
Lori Sanchez
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TANNER v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00082
Defendant:
VALLEY ENTERPRISES OF INDIANA, INC. and CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. TANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK-BATES v. HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
as 1:2019cv04283
Plaintiff:
Karen Cook-Bates
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC D/B/A CVS PHARMACY and HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
