Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Fairley et al v. Panalpina, Inc.
as 1:2013cv06495
Plaintiff:
Roger Fairley and Joyce Fairley
Defendant:
Panalpina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Blue Chip Casino, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv05832
Plaintiff:
Nancy Rogers
Defendant:
Blue Chip Casino, LLC and Boyd Gaming Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jonasen et al v. Best Buy Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02784
Defendant:
Best Buy Company, Inc. and Rogers Electric Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Erik Jonasen and Robert Batten, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROGERS v. BROWN et al
as 4:2012cv00074
Defendant:
LAMONT BROWN, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, CO. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff:
CAROL L. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Butler v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2012cv01328
Plaintiff:
Rogers Butler
Defendant:
Eric Shinseki and U. S. Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roger Graves v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 11-2460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER GRAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
EBY v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
EDWIN EBY
Third Party Plaintiff:
MENARD, INC.
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Third Party Defendant:
R.W. ROGERS COMPANY, INC. and THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
ROGERS v. SENATE SQUARE INDIANAPOLIS, LLC
as 1:2010cv01326
Plaintiff:
DELORES ROGERS
Defendant:
SENATE SQUARE INDIANAPOLIS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Griffin v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06765
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Griffin
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Roger Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. United States et al
as 1:2010cv00220
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant:
United States, Theresa L Springmann, Tina Nommay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
