Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Prueter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04287
Plaintiff:
Beth A. Prueter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charlotte Robinson, et al v. Davol, Inc., et al
as 17-2068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLOTTE ROBINSON, as co-personal representative of the Estate of GEORGIA J. BOWERSOCK, deceased, MARK BOWERSOCK, individually and BOBBY DON BOWERSOCK, as co-personal representative of the Estate of GEORGIA J. BOWERSOCK, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Burke v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv09713
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIGSBY v. DAVOL INC.
as 1:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
NICK C BIGSBY
Defendant:
DAVOL INC.
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dellamano et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01329
Plaintiff:
Clifton Dellamano and Jean Dellamano
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. , Davol, Inc. , Morris Kugler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Davol, Inc.
as 1:2014cv09283
Defendant:
Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Jones and Troy L. Vincent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burke v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv08352
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burke
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monson, Barbara v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00467
Plaintiff:
Barbara Monson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Bard Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Jessie Jones
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hornestein, Debrah v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00805
Plaintiff:
Debrah Hornestein
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.