Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Miller et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Mary Miller and Gene Miller
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaiser et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Barbara Kaiser and Anton Kaiser
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worrell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Doreen Worrell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03314
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Babette Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kislia et al v Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Kislia and James Kislia
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcotte v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 1:2015cv11553
Plaintiff:
Dianna Marcotte
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Witte v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07244
Plaintiff:
Sheri Witte
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rousseau v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07248
Plaintiff:
Carol Rousseau
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Werner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07245
Plaintiff:
Nichole Werner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
