Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Meyer v. Mikulski et al
as 1:2013cv08827
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Meyer
Defendant:
Barbara Mikulski , Robb Fraley, Hugh Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv08149
Plaintiff:
Vince Davis, Sr
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department, LeRoy Martin, Bradford Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers et al v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01768
Plaintiff:
Brian Rogers , Constantin Yiannacopoulos , Ann Miller and others
Defendant:
Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. and Keller's Creamery, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Holstein vs. The American Bar Association
as 1:2009cv06239
Plaintiff:
Thomas Holstein
Defendant:
American Bar Association, Thomas R Fitzgerald, Charles E Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Knight et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2008cv07089
Plaintiff:
Kenny Knight, Kenny Knight, Kenny Knight and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless, Inc., Sprint-Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vandiver et al v. Champion Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv05340
Plaintiff:
Jerry Vandiver, William Jaworski and La Salsa Chilena
Defendant:
Champion Laboratories, Inc., Champion Laboratories, Inc., United Components Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Integrated Global Concepts, Inc. v. j2 Global Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03494
Plaintiff:
Integrated Global Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
j2 Global Communications, Inc., Catch Curve, Inc., Richard Ressler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
WILLIAMS v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07003
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2007ml09831
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
