Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Harris v. Wainscott et al
as 1:2018cv02789
Plaintiff:
Gregory N Harris
Defendant:
Brian Wainscott , Ben Fapso , Reginald Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. City of North Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv00571
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Hernandez
Defendant:
City of North Chicago, Officer Mueller and Officer Friel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan Bell v. P.O. Curtis Sellars et al
as 1:2016cv11073
Plaintiff:
Duncan Bell
Defendant:
P.O. Curtis Sellars , P.O. Tolver and City of North Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. Tessman et al
as 1:2016cv04885
Defendant:
Lucian Tessman, William Valko, Donald Meadie and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jucha v. City of North Chicago, Illinois
as 1:2013cv08629
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jucha
Defendant:
City of North Chicago, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
gary v. City Of North Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv08048
Plaintiff:
charles gary
Defendant:
City Of North Chicago, William Bogdala, Officer cancino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McGill v. City Of North Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv07722
Plaintiff:
Jerrad McGill
Defendant:
City Of North Chicago, Salvatore Cecala, Arthur Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmerson v. Sarabia et al
as 1:2013cv01750
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Jimmerson
Defendant:
Det. Jose Sarabia, City Of North Chicago and Inv. Ramtin Sabet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. City Of North Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv00150
Defendant:
City Of North Chicago, Unknown Officers & Agents and Sabet
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. City Of North Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv09915
Defendant:
City Of North Chicago , William Bogdala , Raymond Hartmann and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
