Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Palmer et al v. Wolf et al
as 2:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
William Shecoby Palmer, Vivian Ann Watson, William Palmer and others
Defendant:
Vernon Wolf and Venture Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAKE v. CHAO et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAKE
Defendant:
STANLEY CHAO, FIRST LOAN, NP FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RANKIN v. NINGODWAASWI, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01519
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RANKIN
Defendant:
NINGODWAASWI, LLC, SKYTRAIL SERVICING GROUP LLC, WILLIAM C. "CHENEY PRUETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HACKER v. MINTO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv01485
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN HACKER
Defendant:
MINTO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, BENHTI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DOUGLAS WILLIAM ISAACSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HOPSON v. ORAL SURGUREY AND MAXILLOFACIAL GROUP et al
as 4:2012cv00072
Defendant:
SAM AGUAIR, AUTO-SMART, MIKE BENNET and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hass v. Hass et al
as 3:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dr Richard Hass
Defendant:
Monique Herren, Phil Herren, Jeff Hass and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wilson et al v. DirectBuy Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00416
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Wilson , Regina Ingram , Gary Ingram and others
Defendant:
DirectBuy Inc , United Consumers Club Inc and DirectBuy Holdings Inc
Movant:
State of West Virginia
Amicu:
State of Connecticut and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
