Cases 131 - 140 of 7,244
Dean v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16236
Petitioner:
Frederick Dean
Respondent:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Brookhart
as 3:2023cv03337
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Gardner
Respondent:
Deanna M. Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estrada v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv03338
Petitioner:
Amber Rose Estrada
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois and Melinda Eddy
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rainey v. Willis
as 1:2023cv16403
Petitioner:
Tevin Rainey
Respondent:
Anthony Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dida v. Hvarre
as 1:2023cv01421
Petitioner:
Mohamed Dida
Respondent:
State of Illinois and Kimberly Hvarre
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Truitt
as 1:2023cv16077
Petitioner:
Mark Downs
Respondent:
Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Hinthorne
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin
Respondent:
Cherryl Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Condon v. Wills
as 3:2023cv03747
Petitioner:
Andrew Condon
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saavedra-Moreno v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50423
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Saavedra-Moreno
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hoskins v. Lammer
as 3:2023cv50443
Petitioner:
Walter Hoskins
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
